<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
			<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='https://www.amundsendavislaw.com/rss.xsl' ?>
			<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'
					xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
					xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
				<channel>
					<title>Newsletters &amp; Alerts RSS Feed: Amundsen Davis</title>
					<link>https://www.amundsendavislaw.com/feed-Newsletters-Alerts-RSS-Feed.rss?break_the_cache=1778095719</link>
					<atom:link href='https://www.amundsendavislaw.com/feed-Newsletters-Alerts-RSS-Feed.rss?break_the_cache=1778095719' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
					<description><![CDATA[The latest updates to Newsletters &amp; Alerts RSS Feed.]]></description>
					<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 11:40:07 -0400</lastBuildDate>
					
				<item>
				<title>U.S. Supreme Court Finds FAAAA Does Not Preempt Negligent Hiring/Selection
Claims Against Freight Brokers</title>
				<link>https://www.amundsendavislaw.com/alert-u-s-supreme-court-finds-faaaa-does-not-preempt-negligent-hiring-selection-claims-against-freight-brokers</link>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>alert-u-s-supreme-court-finds-faaaa-does-not-preempt-negligent-hiring-selection-claims-against-freight-brokers</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 09:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<div>Article</div><div><p>In a unanimous decision issued May 14, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States held that negligent hiring/selection claims against freight brokers are <strong>not preempted</strong> by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA). This ruling significantly increases litigation exposure for brokers, particularly in jurisdictions that had previously found such claims preempted.</p></div>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Are Your Federal Construction Projects Now Subject to the Illinois
Prevailing Wage? What Contractors Must Know</title>
				<link>https://www.amundsendavislaw.com/alert-are-your-federal-construction-projects-now-subject-to-the-illinois-prevailing-wage-what-contractors-must-know</link>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>alert-are-your-federal-construction-projects-now-subject-to-the-illinois-prevailing-wage-what-contractors-must-know</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 09:00:02 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<div>Article</div><div><p>Federal and state prevailing wage mandates are colliding on construction projects in Illinois, exposing owners, developers, and contractors to conflicting compliance obligations and increased project costs. With the enactment of Illinois HB 1189, projects that long fell exclusively under the federal prevailing wage law (Davis-Bacon) may now also be subject to the state&rsquo;s prevailing wage law mandates.</p></div>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Seventh Circuit Ruling Curbs BIPA Damages for Illinois Businesses</title>
				<link>https://www.amundsendavislaw.com/alert-seventh-circuit-ruling-curbs-bipa-damages-for-illinois-businesses</link>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>alert-seventh-circuit-ruling-curbs-bipa-damages-for-illinois-businesses</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 09:00:03 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<div>Article</div><div><p>In a major win for businesses facing Biometric Information Privacy Act (&ldquo;BIPA&rdquo;) claims, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently held that the 2024 amendment limiting damages applies <strong>retroactively</strong> to cases pending at the time of enactment. This decision significantly reduces potential exposure by limiting plaintiffs who allege multiple, biometric data collections or disclosures to a <strong>single recovery</strong>, rather than per-scan statutory damages, even for actions that predate the amendment.</p></div>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>OSHA Revises Heat Enforcement Program for Construction Jobsites, Signaling
Continued Enforcement Instead of a Federal Heat Rule</title>
				<link>https://www.amundsendavislaw.com/alert-osha-revises-heat-enforcement-program-for-construction-jobsites-signaling-continued-enforcement-instead-of-a-federal-heat-rule</link>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>alert-osha-revises-heat-enforcement-program-for-construction-jobsites-signaling-continued-enforcement-instead-of-a-federal-heat-rule</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 09:00:04 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<div>Article</div><div><p>The U.S. Department of Labor has revised OSHA&rsquo;s National Emphasis Program (NEP) on outdoor and indoor heat-related hazards, signaling that construction employers should expect continued heat inspections rather than the rollout of a new federal heat standard. The updated NEP, which takes effect immediately and continues through April 10, 2031, refines how OSHA targets employers, including construction jobsites, for heat-related inspections when the heat index is expected to be 80 degrees or higher.</p></div>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Defamation or Comedy? Lion King Composer’s Lawsuit Tests the Limits of
Reputation Protection</title>
				<link>https://www.amundsendavislaw.com/alert-defamation-or-comedy-lion-king-composers-lawsuit-tests-the-limits-of-reputation-protection</link>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>alert-defamation-or-comedy-lion-king-composers-lawsuit-tests-the-limits-of-reputation-protection</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:00:05 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<div>Article</div><div><p>A new lawsuit filed by Lebohang &ldquo;Lebo M&rdquo; Morake, the Grammy‑winning composer behind the iconic opening chant in Disney&rsquo;s <em>The Lion King</em>, raises important questions about defamation, comedy, and reputational harm.</p>
<p>Morake has sued comedian Learnmore &ldquo;Jonasi&rdquo; Mwanyenyeka for $27 million, alleging that a joking &ldquo;translation&rdquo; of the chant during a podcast appearance damaged his reputation by misrepresenting the meaning of the lyrics to a global audience.</p></div>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Federal Court Draws the Line on PIPS After Muldrow: A Win for Employers in
Walsh v. HNTB</title>
				<link>https://www.amundsendavislaw.com/labor-employment-law-update/federal-court-draws-the-line-on-pips-after-muldrow-a-win-for-employers-in-walsh-v-hntb</link>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>labor-employment-law-update/federal-court-draws-the-line-on-pips-after-muldrow-a-win-for-employers-in-walsh-v-hntb</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 09:00:06 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<div>Blog Post</div><div><p>In the U.S. Supreme Court&rsquo;s 2024 <em>Muldrow v. City of St. Louis</em> decision, the Court expanded the legal standard for what qualifies as an &ldquo;adverse employment action&rdquo; by pivoting from asking whether a change to an employee&rsquo;s terms or conditions of employment was &ldquo;material&rdquo; to whether&nbsp; the change left the employee worse off in those terms or conditions. Unsurprisingly, employers saw a surge of challenges to everyday management decisions in the immediate aftermath.</p>
<p>The First Circuit&rsquo;s recent decision in <em>Walsh v. HNTB Corp.</em>, however, offers an important clarification that should hopefully serve as a blueprint for other courts dealing with this influx of questionable lawsuits.</p></div>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Leveling the Playing Field: How Ohio’s NIL Battle Signals the Future of
High School Sports</title>
				<link>https://www.amundsendavislaw.com/alert-leveling-the-playing-field-how-ohios-nil-battle-signals-the-future-of-high-school-sports</link>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>alert-leveling-the-playing-field-how-ohios-nil-battle-signals-the-future-of-high-school-sports</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 09:00:07 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<div>Article</div><div><p>Ohio is currently at the center of one of the most significant shifts in name, image, and likeness (&ldquo;NIL&rdquo;) rights for high school student-athletes. After years of focusing on NIL in college athletics, the most consequential developments are now occurring much earlier in the athletic pipeline, with direct implications for students, schools, and policymakers.</p></div>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Trump Overhauls Section 232 Tariffs on Patented Pharmaceutical Products</title>
				<link>https://www.amundsendavislaw.com/alert-trump-overhauls-section-232-tariffs-on-patented-pharmaceutical-products</link>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>alert-trump-overhauls-section-232-tariffs-on-patented-pharmaceutical-products</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 09:00:08 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<div>Article</div><div><p>On April 2, 2026, President Trump issued a&nbsp;proclamation&nbsp;under section 232 tariff authority imposing sweeping new tariffs on patented pharmaceutical products and ingredients imported into the U.S., with rates reaching up to 100 percent and taking effect as early as July 2026 for certain companies.</p></div>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Trump Overhauls Section 232 Tariffs on Steel, Aluminum, and Copper</title>
				<link>https://www.amundsendavislaw.com/alert-trump-overhauls-section-232-tariffs-on-steel-aluminum-and-copper</link>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>alert-trump-overhauls-section-232-tariffs-on-steel-aluminum-and-copper</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 09:00:09 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<div>Article</div><div><p>On April 2, President Trump issued a new presidential proclamation adjusting his earlier issued section 232 tariffs on steel, aluminum, copper, and their respective derivative products. The changes went into effect on April 6 and alter how these tariffs are assessed and calculated.</p></div>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>New Federal Research Tax Credit Rules: How Increasing Research Activity Can
Benefit Innovators From the One Big Beautiful Bill Act</title>
				<link>https://www.amundsendavislaw.com/alert-new-federal-research-tax-credit-rules-how-increasing-research-activity-can-benefit-innovators-from-the-one-big-beautiful-bill-act</link>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>alert-new-federal-research-tax-credit-rules-how-increasing-research-activity-can-benefit-innovators-from-the-one-big-beautiful-bill-act</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 09:00:10 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<div>Article</div><div><p>A major shift in federal tax law now allows innovative businesses to deduct many domestic research and experimental costs immediately. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 created new Internal Revenue Code (&ldquo;IRC&rdquo;) &sect;174A, permitting full first‑year expensing of domestic &ldquo;research and experimental&rdquo; costs for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2024.&nbsp;</p></div>]]></description>
</item>

			</channel></rss>