There is a growing circuit split between the Third and Fifth circuits over whether employers can block National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) proceedings while raising constitutional challenges. The disagreement centers on the Norris-LaGuardia Act (NLGA), a nearly century-old law designed to keep federal courts out of labor disputes, which is driving one of the biggest fights in labor and employment law at the moment. With two circuits now at odds, Supreme Court review is increasingly likely and the question is deceptively simple: Can a federal court order the NLRB to stop its proceedings while a lawsuit challenging the Board’s constitutionality plays?
A new wave of litigation under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) has emerged, zeroing in on a technology many employers now routinely use: AI-powered meeting transcription and note-taking tools. In recent months, plaintiffs have filed class actions alleging that vendors like Fireflies.AI collect and store “voiceprints”—unique biometric identifiers derived from speech—without providing the written notice, informed consent, or transparent retention and destruction policies BIPA demands.
JPMorgan Chase, BlackRock, and Charles Schwab have already announced they will match the federal government’s $1,000 seed contribution to Trump accounts for their employees’ children. But for most employers, the question is whether the regulatory landscape is clear enough to make an informed decision.
In Wisconsin, negligent supervision claims are only available when there is an employer-employee relationship. Independent contractor (“IC”) or agency relationships do not suffice and, crucially, the individual must be an IC in practice, not just on paper. This is one of many reasons it is important to actively review and manage your independent contractor relationships to ensure they don’t unwittingly morph into employees.
Effective January 1, 2026, Senate Bill 464 (SB 464) has fundamentally transformed California’s annual pay data reporting framework for employers. The Civil Rights Department (CRD), California's enforcement agency, now has the authority to levy mandatory fines without judicial discretion.
With the May 13, 2026, deadline for filing 2025 data approaching, it is critical for management to maintain an accurate and up-to-the-minute understanding of these obligations. A proactive approach is now essential to avoid costly compliance failures.
Welcome to the Labor and Employment Law Update where attorneys from Amundsen Davis blog about management side labor and employment issues.
RSS Feed