Representative Experience Archive
Amundsen Davis represents construction clients (including in renewable energy) in the defense of petitions for the enforcement of administrative subpoenas under the Prevailing Wage Act brought by the Illinois Department of Labor in Illinois circuit courts.
Erika Stamper successfully won summary judgment for insurer client in an Indiana federal court class action lawsuit in which an insured allegedly targeted financially troubled customers and extracted fees for worthless services. The court found this did not fall within coverage for personal injury, accidental event, or advertising injury.
Amundsen Davis defended the interests of temporary staffing agencies in a case brought by the Illinois Attorney General’s Antitrust Division alleging no-poaching and wage-fixing agreements in a supposed violation of the Illinois Antitrust Act.
Erika Stamper won summary judgment on behalf her insurer client in Indiana federal court. The court found that the insurer had no duty to defend a wrongful death lawsuit against a real estate company arising from an alleged failure to properly list a home as a rental.
Amundsen Davis serves multiple ongoing relationships as ERISA counsel for Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs), including providing ongoing advice and counsel on plan compliance and fiduciary duties, as well as preparing plan documents and participant communications.
The client desired to withdraw from the New Urbanist development and develop the property as a conventional development.
Amundsen Davis obtained a defense verdict for a hospital in an emergency department case involving alleged wrongful death from a delay in triage, diagnosis, and treatment of a patient with a vertebral artery dissection and brain aneurysm.
Amundsen Davis represented an ESOP plan sponsor through multiple ESOP loan refinance transactions, including drafting and review of all loan documentation.
We defended our client against claims for negligence and strict products liability. After discovery and the use of expert witness opinion, we determined that the chain was not sold or manufactured by our client’s company and that the plaintiff may have misused the chain in carrying out his work. We filed a motion for summary judgment, and plaintiff elected to dismiss us.
Amundsen Davis’s real estate team represented a client who sought to create a New Urbanist design development upon ground leased for an 18-hole championship golf course.